Washington v. State
168 So. 3d 1290, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 2015 WL 4554809
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Washington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19119 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 565, 572 (Fla.2008) (requiring that “the defendant must either object at [sentencing] or file a post-sentence motion under rule 3.800(b)” to obtain review of sentencing errors subject to correction under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), including situations where “the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum”); Hope v. State, 134 So.3d 1044, 1046-47 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. State, 168 So. 3d 1290, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 2015 WL 4554809 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
168 So. 3d 1290 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. State
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 357 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Hope v. State
134 So. 3d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)