Washington v. State

355 So. 2d 464, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15346
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1978·No. No. HH-77·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudged to be a mentally-disordered sex offender pursuant to Chapter 917, Florida Statutes (1975), on November 10, 1975. After the committing court was notified that the treatment of the appellant had been completed, a hearing was held May 23, 1977, to determine whether the appellant met the criteria for release as specified in Section 917.20, Florida Statutes.1 We think the court erred in its determination that the department had exhausted all treatment for the appellant.

The testimony at the hearing clearly revealed that treatment which might be beneficial to the appellant was available within the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, although such treatment would require the transfer of the appellant to another facility. Thus the testimony showed that the department had not exhausted all treatment for the appellant, and therefore the appellant did not meet the statutory criteria for discharge. Under these circumstances, the trial court was required to recommit the appellant pursuant to Section 917.20, Florida Statutes.

Therefore, the sentence imposed by the trial court is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 355 So. 2d 464, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15346 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

355 So. 2d 464 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cummings v. State
379 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
O'Steen v. State
366 So. 2d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)