Washington v. State

247 So. 2d 786, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Washington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 1971·No. No. 71-14·Published

Opinion

[787]*787ON MOTION TO DISMISS

MANN, Judge.

All that the record before us shows is that the Public Defender for the Sixth Circuit filed in the trial court a motion to withdraw, which was granted. The appellant filed a motion to reinstate the Public Defender, which was denied. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute the appeal. It seems too much to expect the appellant without assistance of counsel to prepare and file assignments of error and directions to the clerk. Whether there is arguable merit in the appeal is a question which must be determined on more than we now have. Accordingly, we deny the motion to dismiss and request that the Public Defender for the Twelfth Circuit, who has been authorized by law to handle appeals within this district, represent him.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 247 So. 2d 786, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

247 So. 2d 786 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.