Washington v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Washington v. State

185 So. 146, 135 Fla. 100

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 19, 1938·Published

Opinion

Buford, J.

I think the record discloses no reversible error. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. The jury were the judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. The trial judge approved the verdict by denying motion for new trial and we should affirm the judgment.

[101]*101Terrell, C. J., and AVhitfield, J., concur. Brown, and Chapman, J. J., dissent. Thomas, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buford, J.

I think the record discloses no reversible error. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. The jury were the judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. The trial judge approved the verdict by denying motion for new trial and we should affirm the judgment.

[101]*101Terrell, C. J., and AVhitfield, J., concur. Brown, and Chapman, J. J., dissent. Thomas, J., not participating.

Washington v. State, 185 So. 146, 135 Fla. 100 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

185 So. 146 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.