Washington v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Washington v. State

185 So. 146, 135 Fla. 100, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1518

DecidedNovember 19, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 146 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. State, 185 So. 146, 135 Fla. 100, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1518 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

I think the record discloses no reversible error. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. The jury were the judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. The trial judge approved the verdict by denying motion for new trial and we should affirm the judgment. *Page 101

TERRELL, C.J., and WHITFIELD, J., concur.

BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., dissent.

THOMAS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I think the record discloses no reversible error. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. The jury were the judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. The trial judge approved the verdict by denying motion for new trial and we should affirm the judgment. *Page 101

TERRELL, C.J., and WHITFIELD, J., concur.

BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., dissent.

THOMAS, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 So. 146, 135 Fla. 100, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-fla-1938.