Washington v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided April 7, 2022·No. 367, 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICHAEL WASHINGTON, § §

Defendant Below, § No. 367, 2021 Appellant, § §

v. § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 0909018475 A/B (N)

Appellee. § §

Submitted: February 15, 2022 Decided: April 7, 2022

Before VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MOTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion

to affirm, and the Superior Court record, we conclude that the judgment below

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Superior

Court’s November 9, 2021 order denying the appellant’s second motion for

postconviction relief.1

1 State v. Washington, 2021 WL 5232259 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 9, 2021).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, (Del. 2022).

Washington v. State (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.