Washington v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MICHAEL WASHINGTON, § §
Defendant Below, § No. 367, 2021 Appellant, § §
v. § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 0909018475 A/B (N)
Appellee. § §
Submitted: February 15, 2022 Decided: April 7, 2022
Before VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MOTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion
to affirm, and the Superior Court record, we conclude that the judgment below
should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Superior
Court’s November 9, 2021 order denying the appellant’s second motion for
postconviction relief.1
1 State v. Washington, 2021 WL 5232259 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 9, 2021).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. State (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.