Washington v. South Georgia Medical Center

511 S.E.2d 629, 236 Ga. App. 247, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 616, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 145
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 5, 1999
DocketA97A0322
StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.E.2d 629 (Washington v. South Georgia Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. South Georgia Medical Center, 511 S.E.2d 629, 236 Ga. App. 247, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 616, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Andrews, Judge.

In Washington v. South Ga. Med. Center, 226 Ga. App. 554 (487 SE2d 125) (1997), the Washingtons appealed from the trial court’s order dismissing their action against South Georgia Medical Center (the hospital) on the basis that they wilfully failed to appear for their depositions which were noticed to them by the hospital’s co-defendant, Swindle. We reversed, concluding that the trial court had no authority to grant the hospital’s motion for the sanction of dismissal pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-37 (d) because the depositions were noticed, not by the hospital, but by Swindle. Id. In South Ga. Med. Center v. Washington, 269 Ga. 366 (497 SE2d 793) (1998), the Supreme Court reversed this Court, held the trial court had authority to grant the hospital’s motion for sanctions, and remanded the case to this Court to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims. Accordingly, the judgment [248]*248of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Decided February 5, 1999. Elizabeth Pelypenko, for appellants. Young, Thagard, Hoffman, Scott & Smith, F. Thomas Young, Elizabeth C. Cleveland, for appellee.

In imposing the sanction of dismissal against the Washingtons pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-37 (d) for failure to appear for their depositions, the trial court found that the failure was conscious or intentional. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s dismissal of the Washingtons’ action against the hospital. Smith v. Mullinax, 122 Ga. App. 833 (178 SE2d 909) (1970).

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Pope, P. J., Beasley, P. J., Blackburn, Smith, Ruffin, Eldridge and Barnes, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Georgia Medical Center v. Washington
497 S.E.2d 793 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Smith v. Mullinax
178 S.E.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Washington v. South Georgia Medical Center
487 S.E.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 S.E.2d 629, 236 Ga. App. 247, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 616, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-south-georgia-medical-center-gactapp-1999.