Washington v. Propes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2010·No. 10-1181·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1181

DAVID J. WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LARRY W. PROPES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:09-cv-03050-RBH)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David J. Washington appeals the district court’s order

accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, as

modified, dismissing Washington’s complaint without prejudice

and denying his motion for judgment. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Propes,

No. 4:09-cv-03050-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. Propes, (4th Cir. 2010).

Washington v. Propes (Washington v. Propes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.