Washington v. Proffitts

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 8, 2006
• Docket: 06-6170
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6170

ALVIN O. WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STERLING PROFFITTS; STACY GRAHAM, Captain; DONALD E. WRIGHT, Sgt.; TONY GRYMES, Officer; VAUGHN SHULER, Lt.; MARY GRAVES, Grievance Coordinator; APRIL RYDOR, Nurse; OFFICER ROCHEFORT; LT. DYER; OFFICER HALL, Sgt.; OFFICER GRAY, Sgt.; OFFICER BRYANT; BOBBY HARDISON, C.O.; JEFF LLOYD, Officer; BRAD DARNELL, Hearing Officer; OFFICER GOOCHSGN; OFFICER DINGUS; K. JONES, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:04-cv-00671-sgw)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin O. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Eckert Phillips, Standardsville, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Alvin O. Washington appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Washington v. Proffitts,

No. 7:04-cv-00671-sgw (W.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -