Washington v. Parker

14 F.3d 599, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4973, 1994 WL 4695
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1994
Docket93-6452
StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.3d 599 (Washington v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. Parker, 14 F.3d 599, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4973, 1994 WL 4695 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

14 F.3d 599
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jimmie WASHINGTON, Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
Russell PARKER, Chief of Police, Eutawville, SC; Michael
Culler, Public Defender, Orangeburg County; Dr.
Lewis, OCDC, Nurse Glover, OCDC; State
of South Carolina,
Respondents, Appellees.

No. 93-6452.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-787-3-8, CA-93-800-5-8)

Jimmie Washington, Appellant, pro se.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's report and recommendation in his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F.3d 599, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4973, 1994 WL 4695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-parker-ca4-1994.