Washington v. O'Neal

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. O'Neal

641 F. App'x 261

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 21, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2223

StatusPublished

This text of 641 F. App'x 261 (Washington v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. O'Neal, 641 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Washington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed as a motion to reopen her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15-cv-00135-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral' argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Washington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed as a motion to reopen her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15-cv-00135-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral' argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 F. App'x 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-oneal-ca4-2016.