Washington v. O'Neal

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. O'Neal

641 F. App'x 261

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2016·No. No. 15-2223·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Washington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed as a motion to reopen her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15-cv-00135-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral' argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Washington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed as a motion to reopen her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15-cv-00135-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral' argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Washington v. O'Neal, 641 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

641 F. App'x 261 (Washington v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.