Washington v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. North Carolina

471 F. App'x 128

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7515

StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 128 (Washington v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. North Carolina, 471 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Lawrence Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D (E.D.N.C. May 3 & Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Lawrence Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D (E.D.N.C. May 3 & Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 F. App'x 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-north-carolina-ca4-2012.