Washington v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. North Carolina

471 F. App'x 128

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2012·No. No. 11-7515·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Lawrence Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D (E.D.N.C. May 3 & Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Lawrence Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D (E.D.N.C. May 3 & Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Washington v. North Carolina, 471 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

471 F. App'x 128 (Washington v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.