Washington v. Milner

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. Milner

440 F. App'x 230

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2011·No. No. 11-6452·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milford Washington appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Washington v. Milner, No. 2:11-cv-00140-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed March 15, 2011; entered March 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milford Washington appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Washington v. Milner, No. 2:11-cv-00140-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed March 15, 2011; entered March 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Washington v. Milner, 440 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

440 F. App'x 230 (Washington v. Milner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related