Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES

Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES

332 S.W.3d 282, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 38, 2011 WL 135743
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 2011
DocketED 95139
StatusPublished

This text of 332 S.W.3d 282 (Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, 332 S.W.3d 282, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 38, 2011 WL 135743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from two final awards of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, each affirming a separate award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brown
332 S.W.3d 282 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 S.W.3d 282, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 38, 2011 WL 135743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-meridian-medical-technologies-moctapp-2011.