Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution

281 F. App'x 235

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2008·No. No. 07-7697·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Washington appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying [236]*236relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. McCormick Corr. Inst., No. 0:07-cv-00026, 2007 WL 3046696 (D.S.C. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Washington appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying [236]*236relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. McCormick Corr. Inst., No. 0:07-cv-00026, 2007 WL 3046696 (D.S.C. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution, 281 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

281 F. App'x 235 (Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related