Washington v. Harrelson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1094

DAVID J. WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOUIS HARRELSON; RICHARD’S TIRE; KENNY DAVIS, Chief; JAMES A. COX, Honorable,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:09-cv-02745-RBH)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David J. Washington appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v.

Harrelson, No. 4:09-cv-02745-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2010). We also

deny Washington’s motions for an evidentiary hearing and

judgment, and hearing to be heard in open court. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED