Washington v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n
This text of 57 F. App'x 173 (Washington v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Julio Washington appeals the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Washington v. Hampton Roads, CA-01-880-2 (E.D.Va. May 31, 2002). Having granted the motion to submit the case on briefs, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F. App'x 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-hampton-roads-shipping-assn-ca4-2003.