Washington v. Gulf Refining Co.
101 A. 317, 257 Pa. 157, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 699
Opinion
We have not been convinced that the learned 'trial judge erred in refusing to take this case from the jury. Under the testimony it was for them to pass upon the negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, and, as nothing in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh assignments of error calls for a retrial, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. Gulf Refining Co., 101 A. 317, 257 Pa. 157, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 699 (Pa. 1917).
101 A. 317 (Washington v. Gulf Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holderfield v. Rummage Bros. Trucking Co.
61 S.E.2d 904 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Robinson v. American Ice Co.
141 A. 244 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)