Washington v. Greene

552 F. Supp. 991, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16542
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 29, 1982
DocketCiv. A. No. 82-4948
StatusPublished

This text of 552 F. Supp. 991 (Washington v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. Greene, 552 F. Supp. 991, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16542 (E.D. Pa. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION

LUONGO, Chief Judge.

On November 10, 1982, Alonzo Washington, plaintiff pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Daniel Greene, Esquire, his former counsel in a state criminal matter. Plaintiff alleged that the defendant was appointed by [992]*992the state court to represent him in a criminal proceeding, but that the defendant nevertheless requested and received $500.00 from plaintiff’s wife as a fee for such representation. On December 3, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion.

Defendant contends that the complaint fails to state a claim because plaintiff did not and cannot allege a necessary element of a claim under § 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, i.e., that defendant acted “under color of state law” 1 in his capacity as court-appointed defense counsel in a criminal case.

Notwithstanding that plaintiff has filed no response to the motion, I will rule on it since the point of law is so clear that a response would be unavailing. In Black v. Bayer, 672 F.2d 309 (3d Cir.1982), the court held that private and court-appointed attorneys “do not act under color of state law for purposes of § 1983.” Id. at 314.

The accusation made by plaintiff raises serious questions about the propriety of defendant’s alleged conduct, but the federal courts, under § 1983, are not the appropriate forum in which to resolve them. I will enter an order granting the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Bayer
672 F.2d 309 (Third Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 F. Supp. 991, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-greene-paed-1982.