Washington v. Gittere

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 28, 2023·No. 2:19-cv-00614·Unknown

Opinion

2 4 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 kas MATTHEW WASHINGTON, Case No. 2:19-cv-00614-RFB-BNW 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 13 14 45 In August 2020, the Court granted 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petitioner 16|| Matthew Washington’s motion to stay this case while he concluded his investigation of 17|| potential claims. (ECF No. 30.) The Court granted a stay due to the COVID-19 18 pandemic and attendant Nevada Department of Corrections restrictions, including on 19 visitation. Washington now moves the Court to reopen this stayed case for the limited purpose of filing a second-amended petition and supporting exhibits. (ECF No. 35.)

99 Washington otherwise asks the Court to keep the federal case closed while he returns to state court to exhaust new grounds for relief. Respondents do not oppose. (ECF No. 24|| 38.) 25 The Court grants Washington’s motion. Respondents are correct that this case 261! will now be stayed pursuant to Rhines v. Weber rather than due to the COVID-19 a7 pandemic. See 544 U.S. 269, 278 (2005) (providing that a petitioner must demonstrate 28

“good cause for his failure to exhaust, his unexhausted claims are potentially 2 meritorious, and there is no indication that the petitioner engaged in intentionally dilatory litigation tactics”). Respondents also note that their non-opposition should not be construed as a waiver of any potential defenses.

6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Reopen this action 7|| (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to REOPEN THE FILE in this action nunc pro tunc to September 27, 2022, the date on which the second- 10 amended petition was filed. " IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk then administratively RE-CLOSE this action, until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the matter.

44 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the grant of a stay is conditioned upon 15|| Petitioner returning to federal court with a motion to reopen the case within 45 days of 16|| the issuance of the remittitur by the state appellate court at the conclusion of the state court proceedings on the postconviction habeas petition. 18 19 20 21 samen 29 DATED: 28 August 2023.

24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. Gittere, (D. Nev. 2023).

Washington v. Gittere (Washington v. Gittere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhines v. Weber
544 U.S. 269 (Supreme Court, 2005)