Washington v. Fleming

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. Fleming

141 F. App'x 227

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2005·No. No. 05-6538·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Washington v. Fleming, No. CA-02-778-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 17, 2005 & entered Mar. 21, 2005). We deny Washington’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Washington v. Fleming, No. CA-02-778-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 17, 2005 & entered Mar. 21, 2005). We deny Washington’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Washington v. Fleming, 141 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

141 F. App'x 227 (Washington v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related