Washington v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-00509
StatusUnknown

This text of Washington v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Washington v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., (W.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VONCIER WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, 23-CV-509-LJV v. DECISION & ORDER

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

On July 17, 2023, the defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), moved to dismiss the complaint. Docket Item 5. This Court then issued a scheduling order requiring the plaintiff, Voncier Washington, to respond by August 8, 2023, and giving Experian until August 22, 2023, to reply. Docket Item 6. After Washington did not file a response, Experian addressed Washington’s failure to respond in its reply filed on August 18, 2023. Docket Item 7. On August 21, 2023, this Court ordered Washington to show cause, by September 21, 2023, “why this Court should not decide the motion to dismiss based only on the defendant’s submissions.” Docket Item 8. Washington did not respond to the Court’s order to show cause, and the time to do so has long passed. On January 8, 2024, this Court ordered Washington to show cause “why his claims should not be deemed abandoned and dismissed” based on his failure to respond to Experian’s motion. Docket Item 9 at 2; see, e.g., Johnson v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 519 F. Supp. 2d 448, 448-49 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (noting that because the plaintiff failed to respond to a motion to dismiss, the Court “may deem [the plaintiff]’s claims as abandoned”); Palmer v. BCE Inc., No. 03-CV-6421T, 2004 WL 1752601, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2004) (finding that the plaintiff’s “failure to respond to [the] defendant’s motion to dismiss evidences his abandonment of the action”). The Court

cautioned that “[i]f Washington does not respond by [February 8, 2024], this Court will deem his claims abandoned and grant Experian’s motion to dismiss on that basis.” Docket Item 9 at 2. Washington again failed to respond to this Court’s order to show cause, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, this Court hereby deems Washington’s claims abandoned and GRANTS Experian’s motion to dismiss, Docket Item 5. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2024 Buffalo, New York

/s/ Lawrence J. Vilardo LAWRENCE J. VILARDO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson Ex Rel. Sangare v. Commissioner of Social Security
519 F. Supp. 2d 448 (S.D. New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Washington v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-experian-information-solutions-inc-nywd-2024.