Washington v. EMERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP.

354 S.W.3d 259, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1664, 2011 WL 6299085
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2011·No. ED 96869·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Crystal Washington (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. Claimant asserts that the Commission erred in finding that he left work voluntarily without good cause.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission’s decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. EMERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP., 354 S.W.3d 259, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1664, 2011 WL 6299085 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

354 S.W.3d 259 (Washington v. EMERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Young
354 S.W.3d 259 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)