Washington v. EMERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP.

354 S.W.3d 259, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1664, 2011 WL 6299085
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 2011
DocketED 96869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 354 S.W.3d 259 (Washington v. EMERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. EMERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP., 354 S.W.3d 259, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1664, 2011 WL 6299085 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Crystal Washington (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. Claimant asserts that the Commission erred in finding that he left work voluntarily without good cause.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission’s decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Young
354 S.W.3d 259 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
354 S.W.3d 259, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1664, 2011 WL 6299085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-emerson-park-development-corp-moctapp-2011.