Washington v. Cumberland County Jail

161 F. App'x 29
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 05-1594·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment below.1

The record at summary judgment failed to reveal any trial-worthy issue. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c); Triangle Trading Co., Inc., v. Robroy Indus., Inc. 200 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1999). Among other problems, the appellant admitted that he never exhausted [30] administrative remedies concerning his claim that he was denied access to legal materials. Nicolo v. Philip Morris, Inc., 201 F.3d 29 (1st Cir.2000). In addition, he raises new issues on appeal that were not developed below, thus, are not properly before us. Hernandez-Hernandez v. United States, 904 F.2d 758 (1st Cir.1990).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. Cumberland County Jail, 161 F. App'x 29 (1st Cir. 2005).

161 F. App'x 29 (Washington v. Cumberland County Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicolo v. Philip Morris, Inc.
201 F.3d 29 (First Circuit, 2000)
Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.
200 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 1999)
Arnaldo Hernandez-Hernandez v. United States
904 F.2d 758 (First Circuit, 1990)