Washington v. Cumberland County Jail
This text of 161 F. App'x 29 (Washington v. Cumberland County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment below.1
The record at summary judgment failed to reveal any trial-worthy issue. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c); Triangle Trading Co., Inc., v. Robroy Indus., Inc. 200 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1999). Among other problems, the appellant admitted that he never exhausted [30]*30administrative remedies concerning his claim that he was denied access to legal materials. Nicolo v. Philip Morris, Inc., 201 F.3d 29 (1st Cir.2000). In addition, he raises new issues on appeal that were not developed below, thus, are not properly before us. Hernandez-Hernandez v. United States, 904 F.2d 758 (1st Cir.1990).
Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 F. App'x 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-cumberland-county-jail-ca1-2005.