Washington v. COLOR ART OFFICE INTERIORS, INC.

299 S.W.3d 335, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1755, 2009 WL 4824551
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. ED 93173·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Washington appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and no error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. COLOR ART OFFICE INTERIORS, INC., 299 S.W.3d 335, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1755, 2009 WL 4824551 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

299 S.W.3d 335 (Washington v. COLOR ART OFFICE INTERIORS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackmun v. EBG Health Care II, Inc.
299 S.W.3d 335 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)