Washington v. Coastal International Security

633 F. App'x 186
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2016·No. No. 15-1832·Published

Opinion

. Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Washington appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to transfer venue and granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Coastal Int’l Sec., No. 8:14-cv-00331-DKC, 2015 WL 4396616 (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2015; July 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. Coastal International Security, 633 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2016).

633 F. App'x 186 (Washington v. Coastal International Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.