Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa

Alabama Court of Appeals

Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa

96 So. 464, 19 Ala. App. 228, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 101

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1923

Docket6 Div. 125.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 96 So. 464 (Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa, 96 So. 464, 19 Ala. App. 228, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 101 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance; the offense charged being the violation of the prohibition ordinances of said city.

There are no assignments of error as the law requires. A prosecution of this character is statutory and quasi criminal in its nature. The statute (Code 1907, § 6264), which obviates the necessity of assigning errors in criminal cases, has no application to appeals in quasi criminal cases. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 South. 1035.

No questions being presented for review as a result of failure to assign errors on the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

FOSTER, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI