Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa

Alabama Court of Appeals

Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa

96 So. 464, 19 Ala. App. 228, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 101

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1923·No. 6 Div. 125.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance; the offense charged being the violation of the prohibition ordinances of said city.

There are no assignments of error as the law requires. A prosecution of this character is statutory and quasi criminal in its nature. The statute (Code 1907, § 6264), which obviates the necessity of assigning errors in criminal cases, has no application to appeals in quasi criminal cases. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 South. 1035.

No questions being presented for review as a result of failure to assign errors on the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

FOSTER, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance; the offense charged being the violation of the prohibition ordinances of said city.

There are no assignments of error as the law requires. A prosecution of this character is statutory and quasi criminal in its nature. The statute (Code 1907, § 6264), which obviates the necessity of assigning errors in criminal cases, has no application to appeals in quasi criminal cases. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 South. 1035.

No questions being presented for review as a result of failure to assign errors on the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

FOSTER, J., not sitting.

Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa, 96 So. 464, 19 Ala. App. 228, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 101 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

96 So. 464 (Washington v. City of Tuscaloosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related