Washington v. Bartholomew
463 U.S. 1203, 103 S. Ct. 3530, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1383, 51 U.S.L.W. 3919, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 707
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 27, 1983·No. No. 82-1857·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Zant v. Stephens, 462 U. S. 862 (1983). Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would deny certiorari.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. Bartholomew, 463 U.S. 1203, 103 S. Ct. 3530, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1383, 51 U.S.L.W. 3919, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 707 (1983).
463 U.S. 1203 (Washington v. Bartholomew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hacheney
160 Wash. 2d 503 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Kleypas
40 P.3d 139 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2001)
In Re Brown
21 P.3d 687 (Washington Supreme Court, 2001)
Dwayne Earl Bartholomew v. Tana Wood, Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary
34 F.3d 870 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
State v. Reeves
453 N.W.2d 359 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Balderas
711 P.2d 480 (California Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Bartholomew
710 P.2d 196 (Washington Supreme Court, 1985)