Washington v. Atengo

103 A.D.3d 529, 959 N.Y.S.2d 437

This text of 103 A.D.3d 529 (Washington v. Atengo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. Atengo, 103 A.D.3d 529, 959 N.Y.S.2d 437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia Rodriguez, J.), entered August 16, 2011, upon a jury verdict, in plaintiffs’ favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered January 10, 2012, which denied defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict or order a new trial, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Although the court should have given a proximate cause charge, defendants failed to preserve their argument that the trial court erred in declining to charge the jury on proximate cause and to include a jury interrogatory whether the accident was a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs’ injuries, since they neither raised a contemporaneous objection to the court’s denial of their requests therefor nor articulated a cognizable objection after the charge was given (see CPLR 4110-b; Kroupova v Hill, 242 AD2d 218, 220 [1st Dept 1997], lv dismissed in part, [530]*530denied in part 92 NY2d 1013 [1998]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kroupova v. Hill
242 A.D.2d 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 529, 959 N.Y.S.2d 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-atengo-nyappdiv-2013.