Washington University v. Public Service Commission of Missouri

275 U.S. 489
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 21, 1927
Docket21
StatusPublished

This text of 275 U.S. 489 (Washington University v. Public Service Commission of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington University v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 275 U.S. 489 (1927).

Opinion

275 U.S. 489

48 S.Ct. 32

275 U.S. 537

72 L.Ed. 388

STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error,
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ST. LOUIS BREWING ASSOCIATION, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ST. LOUIS BREWING ASSOCIATION, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WAINRIGHT REAL ESTATE COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WAINRIGHT REAL ESTATE COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. HOTEL STATLER COMPANY, Inc., plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company.

No. 21.

No. 22.

No. 23.

No. 24.

No. 25.

No. 26.

No. 27.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 24, 1927

and

Messrs. Charles Nagel, Charles M. Polk and Marion C. Early, all of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. J. P. Painter, of Jefferson City, Mo., for defendant in error Public Service Commission of Missouri.

Mr. Theodore Rassieur, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error Union Electric Light & Power Co.

PER CURIAM.

The writs of error are dismissed on the authority of Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937 (28 USCA § 344; Comp. St. § 1214)), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writs of error as applications for certiorari, the applications are denied for want of a substantial Federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 32 S. Ct. 704, 56 L. Ed. 1205; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 34 S. Ct. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 36 S. Ct. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shulthis v. McDougal
225 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Hall v. Burr
234 U.S. 712 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Norton v. Whiteside
239 U.S. 144 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Phillips v. Oklahoma
275 U.S. 489 (Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 U.S. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-university-v-public-service-commission-of-missouri-scotus-1927.