Washington Township v. Butler

13 Ind. 390
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Ind. 390 (Washington Township v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Township v. Butler, 13 Ind. 390 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application to township trustees for a township road.

Viewers appointed, who reported that the road would be of public utility. Butler, through whose land the line of the road ran, remonstrated, and assessors of damages were appointed, who reported an amount in his favor. The trustees ordered the road established, and the damages to be paid out of the township treasury.

Appeal by Butler to the county commissioners. Appeal dismissed because the bond therefor was made payable to the township. Appeal from the commissioners to the [391]*391Common Pleas. Jury trial in the Common Pleas; according to the practice prescribed in Kemp v. Smith, 7 Ind. P. 471.

L. M. Ninde and H. W. Puckett, for the township.

An increased amount of damages was allowed Butler, which, with the costs, were ordered to be paid out of the township treasury.

The suit was carried on in the names of the petitioners and remonstrant.

We see no error in the case.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. Seixas
24 F. 82 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ind. 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-township-v-butler-ind-1859.