Washington State Grange v. Brandt

171 P.3d 1054, 161 Wash. 2d 1024
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 30, 2007
Docket79693-9
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 P.3d 1054 (Washington State Grange v. Brandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington State Grange v. Brandt, 171 P.3d 1054, 161 Wash. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2007).

Opinion

171 P.3d 1054 (2007)
161 Wash.2d 1024

WASHINGTON STATE GRANGE, a Washington corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Robert J. BRANDT and Myrna L. Brandt, husband and wife; and all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Respondents.

No. 79693-9.

Supreme Court of Washington.

October 30, 2007.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Chambers and Fairhurst, at its October 30, 2007, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. Respondent's motion to strike reply to conditional cross-petition for review and statement of supplemental authorities is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Advance Capital, Inc. v. Actuarial Planning Group, Inc.
171 P.3d 1054 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 P.3d 1054, 161 Wash. 2d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-state-grange-v-brandt-wash-2007.