Washington Savings & Loan Ass'n of Florida v. Concepcion Del Portillo
Opinion
CORRECTED OPINION
Washington Savings and Loan Association of Florida appeals from a Summary Final Judgment enjoining them from enforcing a due-on-sale provision in a mortgage contract after the owner of the mortgaged property had sold or transferred the property without approval of the lender in violation of the contract terms.1 The trial [806] court held, consistent with the holding of earlier Florida and Minnesota cases,2 that absent some showing that transfer of the mortgaged property had impaired the lender’s security, appellant-savings and loan association would not be permitted to enforce the due-on-sale clause.
In a sweeping opinion which issued subsequent to the filing of briefs in this case, the United States Supreme Court held in Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 3014, 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982), that (1) the Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s due-on-sale regulation was meant to pre-empt conflicting state limitations on the due-on-sale practices of federal savings and loan associations,3 and (2) the applicable regulations do not confine a federal association’s right to accelerate a loan to cases where the lender’s security is impaired.4 De la Cuesta overrules the cases which hold that courts may, applying state equity law, refuse to enforce due-on-sale clauses in federal savings and loan association mortgage contracts, and is squarely dispositive of the narrow question presented by this appeal.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Footnotes
If all or any part of the property or an interest therein is sold or transferred by Borrower without Lender’s prior written consent ... Lender may at Lender’s option, declare all the sums secured by this mortgage to be immediately due and payable. Lender shall have waived such option to accelerate if, pri- or to the sale or transfer, the Lender and the person to whom the property is to be sold or transferred reach agreement in writing that the credit of such person is satisfactory to Lender and that the interest payable on the sum secured by this mortgage shall be at a rate as Lender shall request. If Lender had waived the option to accelerate provided in this paragraph 17, and if Borrower as successor in interest has executed a written assumption agreement accepted in writing by Lender, Lender shall release Borrower from all obligations under this Mortgage and the Note.
* * * * * *
Should Borrower or any other person acquiring title to the real estate encumbered here[806] by, transfer said title, or should same be transferred by operation of law, then at the time of such transfer or transfers, Lender at its option and in its sole discretion, shall have the right to increase the rate of interest prescribed in said promissory note to the rate at which Lender shall then be charging on new mortgage loans secured by real estate similar to that encumbered hereby ... such increased rate shall be binding upon all subsequent transferees, and upon Borrower.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
419 So. 2d 805 (Washington Savings & Loan Ass'n of Florida v. Concepcion Del Portillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.