Washington Savings & Loan Ass'n of Florida v. Concepcion Del Portillo

419 So. 2d 805, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21389
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1883
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 419 So. 2d 805 (Washington Savings & Loan Ass'n of Florida v. Concepcion Del Portillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Savings & Loan Ass'n of Florida v. Concepcion Del Portillo, 419 So. 2d 805, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

CORRECTED OPINION

FERGUSON, Judge.

Washington Savings and Loan Association of Florida appeals from a Summary Final Judgment enjoining them from enforcing a due-on-sale provision in a mortgage contract after the owner of the mortgaged property had sold or transferred the property without approval of the lender in violation of the contract terms.1 The trial [806]*806court held, consistent with the holding of earlier Florida and Minnesota cases,2 that absent some showing that transfer of the mortgaged property had impaired the lender’s security, appellant-savings and loan association would not be permitted to enforce the due-on-sale clause.

In a sweeping opinion which issued subsequent to the filing of briefs in this case, the United States Supreme Court held in Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 3014, 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982), that (1) the Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s due-on-sale regulation was meant to pre-empt conflicting state limitations on the due-on-sale practices of federal savings and loan associations,3 and (2) the applicable regulations do not confine a federal association’s right to accelerate a loan to cases where the lender’s security is impaired.4 De la Cuesta overrules the cases which hold that courts may, applying state equity law, refuse to enforce due-on-sale clauses in federal savings and loan association mortgage contracts, and is squarely dispositive of the narrow question presented by this appeal.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Federal Sayings & Loan Ass'n of Winter Haven v. Siegel
456 So. 2d 579 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Quigley
445 So. 2d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 So. 2d 805, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-savings-loan-assn-of-florida-v-concepcion-del-portillo-fladistctapp-1982.