Washington Savings Bank v. Kingston Securities Co.

151 N.Y.S. 306
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 151 N.Y.S. 306 (Washington Savings Bank v. Kingston Securities Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Savings Bank v. Kingston Securities Co., 151 N.Y.S. 306 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1914).

Opinion

GAVEGAN, J.

The facts in this case are similar to those in Northern Bank et al. v. Washington Sav. Bank, 151 N. Y. Supp. 304, decided herewith, and I shall apply the same principles as in that case.

Judgment for the plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint. Motion by plaintiff at the opening of the trial to strike out the affirmative defenses as insufficient in law denied. Objections to .the admission of evidence on which decision was reserved are overruled, and all the evidence is admitted. Defendants’ counterclaims are dismissed. Findings passed upon. No costs.

Submit proposed decision and judgment on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northern Bank v. Washington Savings Bank
88 Misc. 510 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 N.Y.S. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-savings-bank-v-kingston-securities-co-nysupct-1914.