Washington, S. v. Hamilton, H.
This text of Washington, S. v. Hamilton, H. (Washington, S. v. Hamilton, H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
SHERRILYN D. WASHINGTON, : No. 19 MM 2016 : Respondent : : : v. : : : HARRY E. HAMILTON, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition
for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Petitioner has 30 days from this
order in which to submit his Petition for Allowance of Appeal.
To the extent Respondent’s Answer seeks sanctions, it is DENIED, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Washington, S. v. Hamilton, H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-s-v-hamilton-h-pa-2016.