Washington Party Nominations

85 A. 873, 237 Pa. 567, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 966
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 17, 1912
DocketAppeals, Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A. 873 (Washington Party Nominations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Party Nominations, 85 A. 873, 237 Pa. 567, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 966 (Pa. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A proceeding in the Common Pleas to determine the legality of nomination papers is purely statutory and without appeal. The findings of fact and. the merits of the case are not subject to review. On certiorari under the general supervisory powers of this court our jurisdiction is limited to an inspection of the record to determine whether there are substantial irregularities or defects of jurisdiction: Robb’s Nomination, 188 Pa. 212; Independence Party Nomination, 208 Pa. 108; Von Moss’s Election, 219 Pa. 453. The only assignment of error relates to the overruling of an offer of testimony and it does not present a question that we have jurisdiction to consider. The appeals are dismissed and the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nomination Certificate of Robb
41 A. 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Independence Party Nomination
57 A. 344 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Von Moss's Election
68 A. 1019 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A. 873, 237 Pa. 567, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-party-nominations-pa-1912.