Washington National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Conley

D.C. Circuit

Washington National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Conley

31 App. D.C. 439, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5643

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1908

DocketNo. 1800

StatusPublished

This text of 31 App. D.C. 439 (Washington National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Conley, 31 App. D.C. 439, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5643 (D.C. Cir. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Robb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In this case the facts are substantially the same as the facts in Washington Nat. Bldg. & L. Asso. v. Pifer, ante, 434, except that Oonley is not the owner of the real estate mentioned in the bill, having conveyed the same by a deed in which he agreed to save the grantee harmless from any claim the association might assert against the property under its deed of trust. Prior [440]*440to the filing of this suit by Conley, the association had commenced foreclosure proceedings in West Virginia against said property.

Remedy at law being inadequate, .we think Conley entitled to prosecute this suit.

Decree affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Robb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In this case the facts are substantially the same as the facts in Washington Nat. Bldg. & L. Asso. v. Pifer, ante, 434, except that Oonley is not the owner of the real estate mentioned in the bill, having conveyed the same by a deed in which he agreed to save the grantee harmless from any claim the association might assert against the property under its deed of trust. Prior [440]*440to the filing of this suit by Conley, the association had commenced foreclosure proceedings in West Virginia against said property.

Remedy at law being inadequate, .we think Conley entitled to prosecute this suit.

Decree affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 App. D.C. 439, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-national-building-loan-assn-v-conley-cadc-1908.