Washington Mutual Bank, Fa v. Shorebank Corporation
714 N.W.2d 334, 475 Mich. 874
Opinion
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SHOREBANK CORPORATION and Standard Federal Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees, and
Hanna Shina, a/k/a John Shina, and Jaklin Shina, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington Mutual Bank, Fa v. Shorebank Corporation, 714 N.W.2d 334, 475 Mich. 874 (Mich. 2006).
714 N.W.2d 334 (Washington Mutual Bank, Fa v. Shorebank Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.