Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson

704 A.2d 306, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 33, 1998 WL 28160
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1998·No. No. 96-SP-1784·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the reply thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 28, 1997, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before January 26,1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson, 704 A.2d 306, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 33, 1998 WL 28160 (D.C. 1998).

704 A.2d 306 (Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson
726 A.2d 172 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)