Home/Fourth Circuit/Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Hall

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Hall

527 F.2d 1166
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 23, 1975
DocketNos. 75-1477, 75-1539
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 527 F.2d 1166 (Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Hall, 527 F.2d 1166 (4th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We think that the district court correctly decided that jurisdiction was vested in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to hear and determine a condemnation action instituted by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to condemn the land located within that district. Jurisdiction was vested by § 81 of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Compact and it was not ousted by § 82(b) of that agreement.

The judgment of the district court is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Rose K. Hall, Owner of Parcel Vk047, Parcel of Land in Arlington County, Virginia, and Four Parcels of Land in Arlington County, Virginia, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Arlington Trust Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, and Rose K. Hall, Owner of Parcel Vk047
527 F.2d 1166 (Fourth Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 F.2d 1166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-metropolitan-area-transit-authority-v-hall-ca4-1975.