Washington & Idaho Railroad Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.

21 P. 562, 2 Idaho 580, 1889 Ida. LEXIS 14
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 21 P. 562 (Washington & Idaho Railroad Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington & Idaho Railroad Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co., 21 P. 562, 2 Idaho 580, 1889 Ida. LEXIS 14 (Idaho 1889).

Opinions

WEIR, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants, in which the plaintiff asks a judgment and decree of this court enjoining the defendant, and all persons claiming under it, from in any manner entering upon the right of way of the plaintiff at the town of Wallace, in the county of Shoshone, extending in length a mile and a half, and in width one hundred feet on each side of the central line of the railroad of plaintiff, as surveyed and designated on the ground, and from further constructing said railroad on said right of way, and from interfering with the plaintiff in the peaceable and exclusive possession and occupancy of said right of way; and that the title be decreed in the plaintiff as against the defendant. It therefore appears that this action is for a final judgment of injunction in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. An answer was interposed by the defendant, and upon issues framed the cause came on for trial. A preliminary injunction was granted in this cause, hut was subsequently vacated upon motion. It appears from the findings in this case that, at the time of the trial thereof, the defendant had completed its line of road over the disputed ground, and was in the actual use and occupation of the same. The plaintiff, it would seem, had an adequate remedy at law, if its contention is correct, and the court below was right in refusing a judgment of perpetual injunction, as prayed for; but we think that the court should not, in that case, have passed upon the ownership and title of the premises in question, but should have left the plaintiff to his action at law. The judgment of the court below should be modified as we have stated, and, as modified, the same is affirmed, without costs to either party in this court or in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.
859 A.2d 981 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2004)
Dunn v. White
479 P.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1970)
Kincaid v. Wade
410 P.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1966)
Thomas, Administrator v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
340 P.2d 379 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1959)
State v. Fields
318 P.2d 1018 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1957)
State v. Ragland
246 P.2d 276 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1952)
Henderson v. Deckert
162 P.2d 88 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1945)
Anderson v. Thompson
22 P.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1933)
Security Stove & Manufacturing Co. v. Sellards
3 P.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1931)
Putnam v. Putnam
282 P. 855 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)
Foley v. Crawford
264 P. 59 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1928)
State v. Bell
250 P. 281 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1926)
Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Faulkner
241 P. 431 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)
State v. Ingalls
236 P. 824 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)
Stone v. City of Pleasanton
223 P. 312 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)
Leinbach v. Dyatt
212 P. 894 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)
Matthews v. Langhofer
202 P. 634 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1921)
State v. Pack
186 P. 742 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)
State v. Taylor
133 P. 861 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)
State v. Dollar
128 P. 365 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P. 562, 2 Idaho 580, 1889 Ida. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-idaho-railroad-co-v-coeur-dalene-railway-navigation-co-idaho-1889.