Washington, Frederick, Ind., and A/N/F Thai-Wona Washington v. Johnston, Sherry Follette, Johnston, Michael, Smith, Vicki Robin A/K/A Smith, Anna Nicole, D.L. Peterson Trust, Schering-Plough Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 27, 2002
Docket14-02-00082-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Washington, Frederick, Ind., and A/N/F Thai-Wona Washington v. Johnston, Sherry Follette, Johnston, Michael, Smith, Vicki Robin A/K/A Smith, Anna Nicole, D.L. Peterson Trust, Schering-Plough Corporation (Washington, Frederick, Ind., and A/N/F Thai-Wona Washington v. Johnston, Sherry Follette, Johnston, Michael, Smith, Vicki Robin A/K/A Smith, Anna Nicole, D.L. Peterson Trust, Schering-Plough Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington, Frederick, Ind., and A/N/F Thai-Wona Washington v. Johnston, Sherry Follette, Johnston, Michael, Smith, Vicki Robin A/K/A Smith, Anna Nicole, D.L. Peterson Trust, Schering-Plough Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion filed June 27, 2002

Dismissed and Opinion filed June 27, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-00082-CV

FREDERICK WASHINGTON, Individually and as Next Friend of THAI-WONA WASHINGTON, Appellants

V.

SHERRY FOLLETTE JOHNSTON, MICHAEL JOHNSTON, VICKI ROBIN SMITH a/k/a ANNA NICOLE SMITH, D. L. PETERSON TRUST, and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, Appellees

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 92-07397

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 7, 2002.  No clerk=s record has been filed.  The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellants did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 


On May 28, 2002, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court's intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellants paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Appellants filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed June 27, 2002.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Anderson and Frost.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Washington, Frederick, Ind., and A/N/F Thai-Wona Washington v. Johnston, Sherry Follette, Johnston, Michael, Smith, Vicki Robin A/K/A Smith, Anna Nicole, D.L. Peterson Trust, Schering-Plough Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-frederick-ind-and-anf-thai-wona-washington-v-johnston-texapp-2002.