Washington Finance Corp. v. Samuels

224 A.D. 672
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. It was error to refuse to grant the defendant’s request to submit the questions of fact to the jury. Defendant’s motion for a direction of a verdict [673]*673did not bar his receding from that motion and requesting a submission of the question of fact to the jury. (Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 210 App. Div. 461; Scott v. Empire State Degree of Honor, 204 id. 530; Kinner v. Whipple, 198 N. Y. 585; Brown Paint Co. v. Reinhardt, 210 id. 162.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington Finance Corp. v. Samuels, 224 A.D. 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

224 A.D. 672 (Washington Finance Corp. v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warshow v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
253 A.D. 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
MacIvor v. Schwartzman
226 A.D. 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)