Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Village Mall Townhouse, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Village Mall Townhouse, Inc.

53 A.D.2d 611, 384 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13290

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 611 (Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Village Mall Townhouse, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Village Mall Townhouse, Inc., 53 A.D.2d 611, 384 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by Bankers Trust Company, plaintiff in Action No. 5, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 19, 1976, as granted the branches of the motion of respondent Washington Federal Savings and Loan Association which sought to remove Action No. 5 to Queens County and to have it tried jointly with Actions No. 1 through 4. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion there are sufficient questions of law or fact, common to all actions, to justify a joint trial (see CPLR 602). Appellant has failed to establish that it will be substantially prejudiced by a joint trial. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by Bankers Trust Company, plaintiff in Action No. 5, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 19, 1976, as granted the branches of the motion of respondent Washington Federal Savings and Loan Association which sought to remove Action No. 5 to Queens County and to have it tried jointly with Actions No. 1 through 4. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion there are sufficient questions of law or fact, common to all actions, to justify a joint trial (see CPLR 602). Appellant has failed to establish that it will be substantially prejudiced by a joint trial. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 611, 384 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-village-mall-townhouse-inc-nyappdiv-1976.