Washington ex rel. Clithero v. Showalter
284 U.S. 573, 52 S. Ct. 15
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of á substantial federal question. Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191. Messrs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington ex rel. Clithero v. Showalter, 284 U.S. 573, 52 S. Ct. 15 (1931).
284 U.S. 573 (Washington ex rel. Clithero v. Showalter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Engel v. Vitale
18 Misc. 2d 659 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
319 U.S. 624 (Supreme Court, 1943)