Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington

231 U.S. 742, 34 S. Ct. 318, 58 L. Ed. 463, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2513
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 15, 1913·No. No. 127·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. W. F. Hays and Mr. Chas. E. Shepard for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Alfred Battle, Mr. George B. Cole, Mr. Richard A. Ballinger, Mr. George E. de Steiguer, Mr. Jas. A. Kerr, Mr. W. V. Tanner, Mr. Douglas C. Conover, Mr. Wm. M. Watson, Mr. Chas. W. Bunn, Mr. Ira Bronson, Mr. Jas. B. Murphy, Mr. Wm. B. Stratton and Mr. John C. Higgins for the defendants in error.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677. 2. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Standard Oil Company of Indiana v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 271, 287.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington, 231 U.S. 742, 34 S. Ct. 318, 58 L. Ed. 463, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2513 (1913).

231 U.S. 742 (Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Kinnear
239 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington
235 U.S. 688 (Supreme Court, 1914)