Washington Davis v. the Honorable Ural Glanville, Judge of Fulton County Superior Court
This text of Washington Davis v. the Honorable Ural Glanville, Judge of Fulton County Superior Court (Washington Davis v. the Honorable Ural Glanville, Judge of Fulton County Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 11, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25E0091. WASHINGTON DAVIS v. THE HONORABLE URAL GLANVILLE, JUDGE OF THE FULTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.
Upon consideration of Washington Davis’s Rule 40 (c) motion, the motion is hereby DENIED. See Court of Appeals Rule 40 (c).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/11/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Washington Davis v. the Honorable Ural Glanville, Judge of Fulton County Superior Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-davis-v-the-honorable-ural-glanville-judge-of-fulton-county-gactapp-2025.