Washington County v. May

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Washington County v. May

87 S.E. 766, 17 Ga. App. 511, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 736

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 20, 1916

Docket6582

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 766 (Washington County v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington County v. May, 87 S.E. 766, 17 Ga. App. 511, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 736 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. “A county is not liable for suit for any cause of action, unless made so by statute.” Civil Code, § 384.

2. A petition which asserts a primary liability on the part of a county because of injuries to live stock, alleged to have been due to the defective condition of a bridge, and which does not allege that the bridge was a public bridge and that it was erected after the passage of the act approved December 29, 1888 (Acts of 1888, p. 39, Civil Code, § 748), should he dismissed on demurrer. "There could be no liability set forth in the petition without an allegation that the bridge was erected after the passage of that act.” Seymore v. Elbert County, 116 Ga. 371, 372 (42 S. E. 727).

(a) The petition in the ease under consideration alleged that the defective bridge which brought about the injuries complained of was a county bridge erected and maintained by the defendant, and that the defendant had allowed it to fall into bad repair. Conceding that the petition alleged with sufficient clearness and distinctness that the bridge complained of was a public bridge within the meaning of the law, it is nowhere alleged that the bridge was constructed since the passage of the aforesaid act of 1888. An admission that the bridge was a public bridge would not dispense with proof that it was in point of fact erected after the passage of the act of 1888, since there were public county bridges long prior to the act of 1888. Floyd County v. Baker, 11 Ga. App. 188 (74 S. E. 936). Since this proof is essential to authorize a recovery, an averment in the petition alleging this essential fact was necessary to set forth a cause of action, and without such an averment the petition was subject to dismissal on general demurrer. See Butts County v. Johnson, 136 Ga. 354 (71 S. E. 428); Salter v. Decatur County, 15 Ga. App. 687 (84 S. E. 162); Counties of Bibb and Crawford v. Dorsey, 90 Ga. 72 (15 S. E. 647).

3. The court erred in not sustaining the demurrer, and therefore the further proceedings were nugatory and need not be considered.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

1. “A county is not liable for suit for any cause of action, unless made so by statute.” Civil Code, § 384.

2. A petition which asserts a primary liability on the part of a county because of injuries to live stock, alleged to have been due to the defective condition of a bridge, and which does not allege that the bridge was a public bridge and that it was erected after the passage of the act approved December 29, 1888 (Acts of 1888, p. 39, Civil Code, § 748), should he dismissed on demurrer. "There could be no liability set forth in the petition without an allegation that the bridge was erected after the passage of that act.” Seymore v. Elbert County, 116 Ga. 371, 372 (42 S. E. 727).

(a) The petition in the ease under consideration alleged that the defective bridge which brought about the injuries complained of was a county bridge erected and maintained by the defendant, and that the defendant had allowed it to fall into bad repair. Conceding that the petition alleged with sufficient clearness and distinctness that the bridge complained of was a public bridge within the meaning of the law, it is nowhere alleged that the bridge was constructed since the passage of the aforesaid act of 1888. An admission that the bridge was a public bridge would not dispense with proof that it was in point of fact erected after the passage of the act of 1888, since there were public county bridges long prior to the act of 1888. Floyd County v. Baker, 11 Ga. App. 188 (74 S. E. 936). Since this proof is essential to authorize a recovery, an averment in the petition alleging this essential fact was necessary to set forth a cause of action, and without such an averment the petition was subject to dismissal on general demurrer. See Butts County v. Johnson, 136 Ga. 354 (71 S. E. 428); Salter v. Decatur County, 15 Ga. App. 687 (84 S. E. 162); Counties of Bibb and Crawford v. Dorsey, 90 Ga. 72 (15 S. E. 647).

3. The court erred in not sustaining the demurrer, and therefore the further proceedings were nugatory and need not be considered.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 766, 17 Ga. App. 511, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-county-v-may-gactapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack