Washington Correctional Institution v. Gross

958 So. 2d 479, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7664, 2007 WL 1434939
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 2007
DocketNo. 1D06-124
StatusPublished

This text of 958 So. 2d 479 (Washington Correctional Institution v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Correctional Institution v. Gross, 958 So. 2d 479, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7664, 2007 WL 1434939 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Washington Correctional Institution and York STB (employer/carrier and servicing agent), appeal an order of the JCC awarding Claimant, Joan Gross, a number of medical benefits. Appellants raise a number of issues on appeal, however, we find only one has merit. Because we conclude the JCC’s finding that the heating pad and oxygen supplementation were medically necessary to treat the appellant’s condition is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, we reverse the order to the extent it awards those benefits. We otherwise affirm the order.

“The JCC should only award those medical benefits which are determined to be a medical necessity.” Polk County Bd. of Comm’rs v. Varnado, 576 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The standard of review in a workers’ compensation case as to the medical necessity of awarded benefits is whether competent, substantial evidence supports the JCC’s ruling. See CEM Enters., Inc. v. Thompson, 859 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). In the instant case there was no'testimony in the record indicating that the heating pad was medically necessary to treat Claimant’s conditions. Additionally, the Claimant’s treating physician testified that oxygen supplementation would not be helpful or effective in treating her conditions. Thus, competent, substantial evidence does not exist to support the JCC’s finding that the heating pad and oxygen supplementation were medically necessary to treat Claimant’s conditions. Accordingly, we reverse the order to the extent it directs Appellants to reimburse Claimant for the heating pad, nasal cannula and oxygen rental. In all other respects the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.

BROWNING, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

POLK COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS v. Varnado
576 So. 2d 833 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
CEM ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Thompson
859 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 So. 2d 479, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7664, 2007 WL 1434939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-correctional-institution-v-gross-fladistctapp-2007.