Washington Brick Co. v. Belt

D.C. Circuit

Washington Brick Co. v. Belt

13 App. D.C. 202, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3206

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 21, 1898

DocketNo. 803

StatusPublished

This text of 13 App. D.C. 202 (Washington Brick Co. v. Belt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington Brick Co. v. Belt, 13 App. D.C. 202, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3206 (D.C. Cir. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The appeal in this case must be dismissed at the cost of the appellants, the Washington Brick Company and the Raritan Hollow and Porous Brick Company. They were defendants in the bill of interpleader filed by Joseph Richardson and James A. Burgess, the dismissal of which, upon demurrer presented thereto by the administrators of Jones, has been affirmed in No. 802.

There was nothing in the decree dismissing the bill filed against them, as well as the administrators of Jones, from which they had any right to appeal. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The appeal in this case must be dismissed at the cost of the appellants, the Washington Brick Company and the Raritan Hollow and Porous Brick Company. They were defendants in the bill of interpleader filed by Joseph Richardson and James A. Burgess, the dismissal of which, upon demurrer presented thereto by the administrators of Jones, has been affirmed in No. 802.

There was nothing in the decree dismissing the bill filed against them, as well as the administrators of Jones, from which they had any right to appeal. Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 App. D.C. 202, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-brick-co-v-belt-cadc-1898.