Washington, Billie Dean
Opinions
OPINION
Billie Dean Washington pleaded guilty to sexual assault of a child. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he was placed on deferred adjudication for ten years. The State moved to adjudicate guilt, and Washington pleaded true to the allegations. Without an agreed recommendation for punishment and before sentencing, Washington waived his right to appeal in a written stipulation of evidence. The trial judge found Washington guilty and sentenced him to twenty years’ confinement and a fine of $10,000.
The First Court of Appeals dismissed Washington’s pro se appeal for want of jurisdiction, noting that Washington’s waiver supported the trial judge’s certification that Washington waived his right to appeal.1 But when a defendant waives his [590]*590right to appeal before sentencing and without an agreement on punishment, the waiver is not valid.2 And contrary to the State’s assertion, the record does not confirm that the State gave any consideration for Washington’s waiver.3 So, on this record, Washington’s waiver was not valid.4 We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this case to the court of appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
363 S.W.3d 589 (Washington, Billie Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.